<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Britain&#8217;s Modern History Boy, Andrew Marr</title>
	<atom:link href="http://filtnib.com/2008/06/02/andrew-marr/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://filtnib.com/2008/06/02/andrew-marr/</link>
	<description>a brainstorm in a blog (arts, culture and current affairs)</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Jan 2012 14:18:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick</title>
		<link>http://filtnib.com/2008/06/02/andrew-marr/#comment-89</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Patrick]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2008 14:28:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://filtnib.wordpress.com/?p=165#comment-89</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I listened to the entire cd version on a gargantuan drive from Calcutta to Delhi, was excellent (although the section on Thatcher provoked a two hour argument in the car), and as you said made some rather hazy corners of British modern history seem altogether clearer.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I listened to the entire cd version on a gargantuan drive from Calcutta to Delhi, was excellent (although the section on Thatcher provoked a two hour argument in the car), and as you said made some rather hazy corners of British modern history seem altogether clearer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: howstrangeitis</title>
		<link>http://filtnib.com/2008/06/02/andrew-marr/#comment-80</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[howstrangeitis]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2008 22:50:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://filtnib.wordpress.com/?p=165#comment-80</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;ve only seen the first two of these so far but have been impressed. Despite doing a three year history degree I realised I knew very little that has happened in Britain post c.1951. This is definitely how history should be told. Viva Schama, Beevor et al.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve only seen the first two of these so far but have been impressed. Despite doing a three year history degree I realised I knew very little that has happened in Britain post c.1951. This is definitely how history should be told. Viva Schama, Beevor et al.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://filtnib.com/2008/06/02/andrew-marr/#comment-73</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2008 08:54:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://filtnib.wordpress.com/?p=165#comment-73</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I haven&#039;t seen the TV series, but his book on the same topic is pretty good. He has a delightfully old-fasioned BBC prose style - patrician, but in a very readable way. The only problem is when he moves away from politics, and tries to summarise cultural history. Then it becomes very obvious that he&#039;s spent his whole live with politics, and so has nothing at all to say about music, art, etc.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I haven&#8217;t seen the TV series, but his book on the same topic is pretty good. He has a delightfully old-fasioned BBC prose style &#8211; patrician, but in a very readable way. The only problem is when he moves away from politics, and tries to summarise cultural history. Then it becomes very obvious that he&#8217;s spent his whole live with politics, and so has nothing at all to say about music, art, etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

